Get a 911 call that “aggressive dogs are terrorizing a lady in a car“
Send officer out to look things over.
Officer allows one dog to be captured by a neighbor of the owner. But when he attempts to call the other dogs to him they act aggressively so he has to shoot them for his own safety.
Owner calls BS on the “acting aggressively” part and FOIA’s the video from the officer’s lapel cam (yay for wired police!). Police release a 22second bit of video that shows the officer shooting the dog “for his own safety”: http://www.cleburnetimesreview.com/news/article_7e920210-5646-11e4-a670-8fe5949ce1ca.html?mode=video (warning, the video does indeed show the dog being shot, its not the goryest thing ever, but some people will be bothered regardless).
Cue public upset in 3…2….
Additional video from before the shooting: http://www.cleburnetimesreview.com/video_b174524a-5647-11e4-8c6a-cb8bcb24f91e.html
and after the shooting: http://www.cleburnetimesreview.com/video_cee9af92-5646-11e4-8ae5-0b544247bb8a.html (very clear shot of the dead and bloody dog)
I can’t comment on what happened with the dogs cornering someone in their car. Its not on video. I can certainly see how a friendly, excited, reasonably sized, dog bouncing on the car door in an attempt to say “HI!!” could be scary to someone who’s not good with dogs.
In the video from before the shooting I can hear a lady talking to the officer and stating that one of the brown dogs snapped at her. I can hear the officer telling another resident that the black and white dog (who at this time he’s ignoring) was the one acting aggressively. Officer allows the owners’ neighbor to catch and contain the black and white dog.
There’s a gap of at least a few seconds, and possibly longer, between the first video and the 22second video. According to info from the police department the two remaining loose dogs growled at the officer during this gap. Not sure why we don’t have a video of it, releasing that info would go a long way to supporting the officer’s side of the story.
In the 22second clip, you can see the officer approaching the two dogs, who are sniffing a drain pipe and ignoring the approaching human. Tails are slowly wagging, a sign that whatever else is going on the dogs aren’t highly agitated. Whiny barks can be heard, no growling or full throated barks can be heard. Officer points his gun at the dogs, chirps to get their attention, they look at him, and he fires three shots at one of them. Its hard to tell with the officer’s hands in the way of the video, but I saw no sign of either dog actually even moving towards him after he chirps at them. The other dog runs away.
In the final video the officer can be seen repeatedly pointing his gun at the remaining dog every time the so much as looks in his direction. The dog is still not acting aggressively. At this point the ACO finally arrives and takes over, at the ACO’s approach the remaining dog shows every sign of being happy to see a friendly human, and even rolls over on his back for belly rubs. The ACO is able to walk the dog away without so much as a leash to contain the dog.
Now, I certainly have no idea if these dogs are regular escapees. Or how much they’ve terrorized the neighborhood. But nothing in the videos shows aggression, or anything else to cause the officer to fear for his own safety….