Why is it that everyone is FREAKING THE FUCK OUT because there might be a strange guy in the same room as their daughter…..
But no one is FREAKING THE FUCK OUT because current bathroom setups allows the same strange guy in the same room with their son? Even worse, why is no one FREAKING THE FUCK OUT because the same guy might decide to use a urinal RIGHT NEXT TO their son?
Also, donno what goes on in the public bathrooms you’ve been in, but I can’t recall the last time I saw someone’s “private parts” in the main room of the women’s bathrooms I’ve been in. All that’s done in the privacy of the stalls. Where no one can see it anyway.
Look, law or no law, pinning your safety on a sign dictating which set of plumbing is allowed in the bathroom with you is as stupid as assuming that a piece of paper will keep your abusive boyfriend away. If creepy rapist kidnapper dude decides that he’s going to hunt women in public bathrooms the fact that his plumbing doesn’t match the sign on the door isn’t going to stop him. MAYBE allowing folks with different plumbing into a marked bathroom will up the risk level. But I have my doubts. Creepy rapist kidnappers are not restricted to the opposite gender, or to molesting the opposite gender. Public bathrooms are simply not, and never have been, a place to lose yourself in the white zone.
Honestly, the simplest, if costly, solution is to turn all bathrooms unisex. Change the partitions to full length, and get rid of the urinals (seriously, very few guys have them at home, so why do they need them in public?). That way parents can stand within reach of their child of opposite sex while the child uses the bathroom. Guardians of the handicapped don’t have to find a “family” bathroom in order to help their charges on the toilet. And no one flips out at the apparent gender of the person who just walked through the door.
The whole thing could even be phased into usage so that the financial burden isn’t as painful. Swap out the partitions for full length, partition off the urinals with signs on the doors “URINALS ONLY”, and change the signs on the main doors. Then later, as regular maintenance has to be done, swap the urinals out for toilets.
It’d even save money in the long run for new construction as they’d only have to put in one, slightly larger, bathroom in new buildings instead of the two divided bathrooms.
Frankly this sort of thing should have been happening a while ago. And not because of the transgender issue. There are plenty of people out there who mentally match their plumbing, but who’s looks do NOT match their plumbing, and who then get hassled for using the correct bathroom. Plus see above comments about other reasons why someone of the opposite sex might need to be present near by.
And yes, the same sort of thing could be put into place in locker rooms and the like. Though the solution for how to handle the transgendered folks who wish to play sports and whether to put them on the men’s or women’s teams would have to be thought through a bit.
Any person who operates a motor vehicle in this state shall be deemed to have given consent to field testing of his or her mobile telephone and/or portable electronic device for the purpose of determining the use thereof while operating a motor vehicle provided that such testing is conducted by or at the direction of a police officer, after such person has operated a motor vehicle involved in an accident or collision involving damage to real or personal property, personal injury or death. If a person operating a motor vehicle involved in an accident or collision involving damage to real or personal property, personal injury or death has in his or her possession a mobile telephone or portable electronic device, having thereafter been requested to surrender such mobile telephone and/or portable electronic device for field testing, and having been informed that the person’s license or permit to 17 drive and any non-resident operating privilege shall be immediately suspended and subsequently revoked, shall be revoked for refusal to surrender his or her mobile telephone and/or portable electronic device solely for the purpose of field testing, whether or not the person is found guilty of a violation of section twelve hundred twenty-five-c or twelve hundred twenty-five-d of this article, refuses to surrender his or her mobile telephone or portable electronic device solely for the purpose of field testing, unless a court order has been granted pursuant to subdivision four of this section, field testing shall not be conducted and a written report of such refusal shall be immediately made by the police officer before whom such refusal was made. Such report may be verified by having the report sworn to, or by affixing to such report a form notice that false statements made therein are punishable as a class A misdemeanor pursuant to section 210.45 of the penal law and such form notice together with the subscription of the deponent shall constitute a verification of the report.
For persons charged with a violation of section twelve hundred twenty-five-c or twelve hundred twenty-five-d of this article, the license or permit to drive and any non-resident operating privilege shall, upon the basis of such written report, be temporarily suspended by the court without notice pending the determination of a hearing as provided in paragraph (c) of this subdivision. Copies of such report must be transmitted by the court to the commissioner and such transmittal may not be waived even with the consent of all the parties. Such report shall be forwarded to the commissioner within forty-eight hours of such filing of charges.The court or the commissioner shall provide such person with a scheduled hearing date, a waiver form and such other information as maybe required by the commissioner. If a hearing, as provided in paragraph of this subdivision, is waived by such person, the commissioner shall immediately revoke the license, permit or non-resident operating privilege, as of the date of receipt of such waiver in accordance with 2 paragraph (d) of this subdivision.
Any license which has been revoked pursuant to paragraph (c) of this subdivision shall not be restored for at least one year after such revocation, nor thereafter, except in the discretion of the commissioner. However, no such license shall be restored for at least eighteen months after such revocation, nor thereafter except in the discretion of the commissioner, in any case where the person has had a prior revocation resulting from refusal to surrender his or her mobile telephone or portable electronic device for field testing within five years immediately preceding the date of such revocation.
(bolding done by me for emphasis)
Can you say massive privacy violation?? If they want to know if someone was using their cell phone near the time of the incident then they can get a warrant for info from the phone company. Browsing people’s “mobile devices” on the side of the road at the time of the incident is just wrong. Assuming the device used to browse the phone isn’t hackable. I’m sure as hell not going to bet on that, what an opportunity to record data and send it off somewhere……
It passed in the state Senate by 54 to 5. It heads for the Assembly next. Contact your Assembly person and let them know what you think! This would criminalize a very useful tool that is already in a large number of homes in the state. Meaning that your average Joe on the street could be arrested for possession as soon as this law goes into effect.
Nope, sorry, I don’t have to look at it from his POV. 17 is old enough to hold down a part time job. 17 is old enough to be doing odd jobs under the table to earn money. By 17 I was working an average of 20+hrs a week, after school and weekends, for minimum wage. There are plenty of ways he could have been earning the money the get his school clothes. And that’s without doing his shopping at 2nd hand stores, where it’s entirely possible to come up with entire wardrobes worth of clothes for very inexpensively.
But he chose to break into someone’s home instead.
Regardless of what you think of the shooting, the above comment from the robber’s family should disgust you. It’s the perfect example of WHY there’s a problem.
On a slightly amusing note, I can’t find a single picture of the home-owner anywhere, so I’m assuming she’s black too. Guess it’s not fun for the media to persecute someone if they’re not white?
The old trail camera finally gave up the ghost just over two weeks ago. We knew it was coming but were hoping it would hold on for a bit longer. Doing a bit of shopping and looking around and we found the Moultrie M-880 Gen 2 on Amazon for $89. We bought two.
Is it my imagination or is that deer on the small side for a critter that ought to be pushing its 1st birthday??
No sign of whatever produced those tracks I found on Christmas. But I saw on Facebook that someone got a sighting of a Canadian Lynx down in Olean, end of January, which is only a couple-three hours from me……
I’m finally feeling human again, instead of a miserable wad of exhausted snot. Sinus infections suck. Coming on top of the viral stomach bug really really sucked. I was starting to worry about how exhausted I was feeling, but I think I’m finally catching back up.
Course, being sick for most of two weeks means I’ve gotten almost nothing done on the projects I was hoping to get done…..I have the new vinyl tile to go down in the kitchen, got the laundry done before I got sick, but I haven’t touched the kitchen yet.
I need to finish figuring out what, if any, seeds I want to order, and start figuring out the starting order and how I’m going to do all that this year.
And I need to prep a new location for my little greenhouse, cause the wind this winter shredded my old one, so the former location won’t work. Oh, and yup, set up a new one, since the old one was shredded. I’d hoped to have a more permanent structure for my greenhouse this year, but life conspired against me last summer. We just had a major thaw though, so if I can get the energy this weekend I ought to be able to at least get a spot figured out and cleared of debris.
Ran across this video on Facebook yesterday, take a minute to watch, its fricking awesome!
In other news, I found the political platform I want to vote for:
(Links out to Amazon in this post are via my Amazon Associates account, if you buy something after clicking through these links I might earn a few pennies. All linked to merchandise was bought with my own money.)
Onondaga County NY (where I used to live) politicians have decided to give themselves a raise. 27% for the County Executive, and 15% for most of the rest of the county politicians.
The excuse? Its been 8yrs since the last raise and:
even kids working at McDonald’s have had raises in that time.
There’s just one teensy little problem with that comparison……
Nobody, not nobody, in store level retail or food service, receives a 15-27% raise for staying in the same position. Not in today’s economy! And not for the past several years. Certainly the largest raise I’ve ever gotten, with an Excellent yearly review, while staying in the same position, was barely 2%. It was, btw, a whole $0.25 increase in hourly wage. I guess, if you want to assume 2% times 8yrs I MIGHT see a 15-16% raise. But in all honesty? Not really…..
The County Exec will be receiving an additional $33,000 a year.
I don’t have a problem with the concept that someone who’s been in the same position for an extended period, who you feel has done the job well, deserves a raise. But 15-27%?? No fucking way……
But if your door happens to be unlocked, and they can’t get you, they will confiscate your stuff, enter it into property at police headquarters and leave you a note ….. to come down to 1 Union Ave. to pick it up.
Sharp said the search warrant exception that he’s using is known as the “caretaker” exception. The exception allows an officer who sees something of value—in plain view and at risk for being stolen—to confiscate that property for safekeeping.
If your belongings do end up in police hands, you will have 60 days to claim them. And Sharp said he is working with the police property room to help connect people with their things if they are confiscated.
Sharp pitched his plan to the East Rock Community Management Team last week, where he said he received a mostly positive reaction. He argued that a little inconvenience now, will avoid the bigger inconvenience of an actual crime.
But if you don’t come get your belongings, they will become the property of NHPD.